Suppose, hypothetically, a medicinal plant is discovered on
a remote island in the pacific that would cure any disease known to man. When
ingested, all conditions such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes, would no
longer exist. The plant is readily available and easy to grow to the extent
that it became virtually free. This would undoubtedly be approved by all
societies and considered one of the most remarkable discoveries in mankind.
While this discovery may seem certainly good, there’s
another side to consider. The health care industry in the United States employs
roughly 15 million people and is considered one of the highest growing
industries. The new medicinal plant would be so effective that it will nearly
eliminate the health care industry by 95% (not entirely assuming injuries and
other conditions still occurred). Additionally, companies, such as Pfizer,
would be completely out of business because there would not be any need to
invent or manufacture drugs. Health insurance companies would become
extinguished. Even the FDA would be reduced. In essence, we now have more than
15 million additional people unemployed.
Not good. This means the entire wealth of the country would drop, GDP would fall, and economic growth would falter. We could clearly be worse economically.
The point to understand is that the well-being of individuals
in a society may not correlate with economic success. In fact, in can be the
exact opposite as in this case. What we consider as a “strong” nation actually
means more sick and dying people. We really need to reassess what we value and
organize our societies in such a manner. The notion of creating jobs actually has no bearing if people
are happy or not. This also can be said about the condition of the environment.
The more people there are employed in health care the sicker we are. The
question becomes why we are in an economic system that is counter to what we
actually need to value and what we can do about it. It’s something to think
about.
No comments:
Post a Comment